Following Pace/ Power plan but TSS too high
Tagged: Garmin 955 TSS rTSS
- This topic has 6 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 7 months ago by
David Warden.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 28, 2022 at 9:10 am #17445
ECap
ParticipantI am following the Ironman Lvl 2 (Run Pace/ Bike Power) and have noticed my actual TSS score is usually 2x the expected TSS score in Training Peaks.
I am following my pace/ power zones and in general feel as expected after workouts. Is this caused by my heart rate being higher than the generic zones, or training in really hot and muggy weather? Do I need to adjust workouts to account for HR?
Maybe its nothing to worry about but found it odd my TSS is so much higher than expected consistently.
June 29, 2022 at 2:45 pm #17450David Warden
KeymasterE,
Thanks for posting. This is a complicated subject, I’ll try and summarize.
TP makes a guess on predicted TSS. If you are using HR, there is a bug in predicted TSS and it will never be right (see section “TrainingPeaks has some bugs” at https://www.8020endurance.com/your-performance-management-chart-is-lying-to-you/ In fact, read that whole document for an overview of the PMC)
If you are using Pace or Power, it estimates that you will spend your time at a certain point within that zoned range. For example, with Pace, it assumes you’ll be 75% penetrated. In other words, if your Zone range is 8:00 to 10:00 per mile for a particular segment, it will predict a 9:30 pace (75% between 8:00 and 9:00). If you spend your time at the low end of the zone or the high end of the zone, actual TSS will be way off from predicted.
So, the bottom line is predicted TSS will never be right.
In your case, 2x is not explained by the above. What is likely happening is that your threshold is not correctly defined in TP, or you have used a Default zone instead of a specific Pace, Power or HR zone.
For example, if your pace threshold is defined in TP as 8:00 per mile, but your actual threshold pace if 7:00 per mile, this means you’ll perform a Zone 3 interval at about 7:00 per mile, but TP will predict your TSS based on 8:00 per mile.
Read the document https://www.8020endurance.com/understanding-trainingpeaks-workout-plan/ particularly the part about not using a Default zone. If you still have the issue after that, repost here and I’ll look at your account directly.
David
August 2, 2022 at 2:55 pm #17684ECap
ParticipantI found the issue – posting in case someone else has a similar problem.
I upgraded to a Garmin 955 which calculates power and Training Peaks uses Running Power if its available to calculate TSS. I am using a Running Pace plan so I have been training in my pace zones, but without Power Zones set up the TSS was way too high after each run.
By switching to the rTSS in Training Peaks my actual rTSS was very close to the expected TSS in my plan.
I will also try to set a power threshold on my next test so the standard TSS better fits expected TSS as well though.
August 2, 2022 at 8:37 pm #17694David Warden
KeymasterE, thanks for sharing this. Can you send in some actual numbers after your next test. For example:
– My run FTP based on the test is X
– An hour Zone 2 run in TP shows a predicted TSS of Y
– The predicted TSS for the same workout on the 955 is Z
– The actual TSS for the completed workout was A on the Garmin and B in TP.Or something similar.
David
March 2, 2023 at 2:27 am #19062machinekoder
ParticipantInteresting, I’m seeing exactly the same with my FR945 and the Garmin Run Power widget enabled. The power zones are of course completely off, since those are my bike power zones, so pretty much all my run workouts are 90% in the highest power zone. So what is the correct way to select the run power without doing an actual rFTP test, any way to disable the calculation based on power in TP? I’m doing pace-based run training.
March 2, 2023 at 2:48 am #19063machinekoder
ParticipantUpdate: I also switched to rTSS and now the TSS prediction vs actual value looks way better. Is there any chance that old workouts can be updated in TP as well, with the old threshold pace values at the time this training was done?
March 2, 2023 at 7:49 pm #19070David Warden
Keymaster -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.